Orrin Woodward on LIFE & Leadership

Inc Magazine Top 20 Leader shares his personal, professional, and financial secrets.

  • Orrin Woodward

    1
    Former Guinness World Record Holder for largest book signing ever, Orrin Woodward is a NY Times bestselling author of And Justice For All along with RESOLVED & coauthor of LeaderShift and Launching a Leadership Revolution. His books have sold over one million copies in the financial, leadership and liberty fields. RESOLVED: 13 Resolutions For LIFE made the Top 100 All-Time Best Leadership Books and the 13 Resolutions are the framework for the top selling Mental Fitness Challenge personal development program.

    Orrin made the Top 20 Inc. Magazine Leadership list & has co-founded two multi-million dollar leadership companies. Currently, he serves as the Chairman of the Board of the LIFE. He has a B.S. degree from GMI-EMI (now Kettering University) in manufacturing systems engineering. He holds four U.S. patents, and won an exclusive National Technical Benchmarking Award.

    This blog is an Alltop selection and ranked in HR's Top 100 Blogs for Management & Leadership.

  • Orrin’s Latest Book








  • 7 Day Free Access to Leadership Audios!

  • Email Me

  • NY Times Bestselling Book


  • Mental Fitness Challenge

  • Categories

  • Archives

Archive for the ‘Freedom/Liberty’ Category

Without freedom, there is no leadership.

Peloponnesian War: End of Greek Freedoms

Posted by Orrin Woodward on November 26, 2012

Here is my final segment on the Peloponnesian War. Sometimes truth is more fantastic than fiction and Greek history is one of those times. Although I have read extensively in this area, when finally writing down my thoughts, I was shocked by the level of degradation in thinking possible if one does not maintain his absolute principles. One of the main reasons the LIFE Business operates with a Policy Council is to ensure that we  follow the principles espoused.  I remember when Dan Hawkins attending his first PC meetings. He was amazed as the ability for anyone to speak freely when he disagrees with the policy direction. In truth, I wouldn’t have it any other way. I would much rather have one of the PC catch a policy/principle mistake before we PDCA on the entire community! 🙂

In my book RESOLVED: 13 Resolutions for LIFE, I take a whole chapter to describe character, integrity, and principles. Each person should be working on improving his or her character and finding other top leaders to help them on the journey of life. This is exactly what the LIFE Business does, it provides a community of people, who are growing personally and professionally, to aid others on their success journey. I am thankful for leaders like Chris Brady, Tim Marks, and Claude Hamilton and the rest of the LIFE Founders for speaking into my life when needed. LIFE, in other words, is a team sport! Here is the final part of the Peloponnesian War.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

Athens, Sparta and their allies, waged a pitiless war against one another for nearly 30 years with brief respites. Athens failed invasion of SiciIy put them on the defensive, but Sparta didn’t have enough naval power to deliver a knock out blow. The war continued for over twenty additional years despite both sides having little to gain and much to lose. Athens treatment of Melios displays the corrosive effects of the FLD and is representative of the  tyranny practiced by the Athenian empire on its weaker sister cities. Thucydides, in his Melian dialogue, describes the unfolding Greek tragedy. Here is a small portion of the dialogue to convey the detrimental effects of the FLD on Athenian thinking:

Pericles Funeral Oration

Athenian: For ourselves, we shall not trouble you with specious pretenses—either of how we have a right to our empire because we overthrew the Mede, or are now attacking you because of wrong that you have done us—and make a long speech which would not be believed; and in return we hope that you, instead of thinking to influence us by saying that you did not join the Spartans, although their colonists, or that you have done us no wrong, will aim at what is feasible, holding in view the real sentiments of us both; since you know as well as we do that right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must

Melians: You may be sure that we are as well aware as you of the difficulty of contending against your power and fortune, unless the terms be equal. But we trust that the gods may grant us fortune as good as yours, since we are just men fighting against unjust, and that what we want in power will be made up by the alliance of the Lacedaemonians, who are bound, if only for very shame, to come to the aid of their kindred. Our confidence, therefore, after all is not so utterly irrational.

Athenian: Of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not as if we were the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found it existing before us, and shall leave it to exist forever after us; all we do is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we have, would do the same as we do

Strikingly, Athens, the same city who fought Persia’s “might is right” pragmatism, now asserts the same “principles” in its contest with weaker Greek cities. This combination of hypocrisy and hubris has clouded the rationality of leaders in power since history has been recorded. Evidently, although many things have changed, human nature isn’t one of them. Thus leaders must remain vigilant against the debilitating effects of the FLD or it will destroy culture. In the Greek example, it gets even worse, for both leagues, in desperation, appealed to the Persian king for aid against the other. Remarkably, Sparta and Athens, the two former allies against Persia, rather than settle their differences, instead sought to align themselves with their former nemesis Persia. Persia happily complied, aiding Sparta with money and ships to destroy Athen’s superior seapower. Persia did this, not for Sparta’s benefit, but for their own, astounded at their opportunity to destroy both cities at once. Both leagues, willingly sold Greek’s freedom and future – another sad effect of the FLD in action – in an attempt to win the war. At the conclusion of the Peloponnesian War, each side was drained of men, money, and mind, leaving them prostrate before Macedonian machinations.

Posted in Freedom/Liberty | 27 Comments »

Peloponnesian War: Sparta & Corinth Align Against Athens

Posted by Orrin Woodward on November 24, 2012

Here is a portion of my study on the Greeks. It’s interesting to me how much history repeats itself. No one is free from the effects of the Five Laws of Decline, thus it’s important to comprehend them and recognize where they are actively at work. The LIFE Business systems are designed to check the FLD to ensure a “no special deals” culture and anyone can climb to the top based upon results. LIFE, in others words, rewards creators, not credentialist. Credentialist hide behind titles to demand rights, but creators lead from the front through serving others. The dream is to build something that last through having fun, making money, and making a difference, one person at a time. I hope you enjoy part one of the Peloponnesian War.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

With Corinth actively for war, Sparta, as the leader of the Peloponnesian league, still held back. There were conflicting opinions within Spartan leadership. On one side, King Archidamus strongly opposed war, believing the confederacy, in its present condition, needed time before it was ready to face the Athenians. On the other side, Sthenelaidas, the ephor, argued for war immediately or he feared the alliance would break up and Sparta would stand alone against Athens. He believed the oppressor must be withstood immediately by actions, not words, for the honor of Sparta was at stake. When the question was put to the assembly – whether Athens had broken its treaty – a large majority voted in the affirmative and war was declared. Surprisingly, it still took nearly a year before any hostilities broke out as Sparta continued to look for a political solution to the impasse. Nevertheless, when King Archidamus, with his army marching into Athenian territory, sent a final envoy to negotiate a settlement, the Athenians refused to admit him. He was sent away without hearing after being told that no negotiations would occur while the Spartans were in the field. As the envoy departed the Athenian escorting him to the border lands, he uttered the prophetic melancholy words, “This day will be to the Hellenes the beginning of great calamities.” Thus, the destruction of Greek nation was foretold with the beginning of the Peloponnesian War.

The destruction incurred by both leagues in this war should have brought both sides to their senses; instead, it brought both to their knees. Even after the plague hit Athens and tens of thousands were dying from this unknown killer, Pericles remained undaunted. At the suggestion of send a peace envoy to Sparta, Pericles appealed to the glory of empire. Historian Evelyn Abbot describes the effect power had upon Pericles’ mindset:

War was a great evil, which no city would bring upon herself, if it could be avoided, but loss of independence was a greater evil by far, and, when the choice lay between the two, there could be no room for hesitation. Pericles then pointed out that the evils which had overtaken the Athenians, however disastrous to individual citizens, left the strength of the city unimpaired. Their chances of victory were as good as ever. Their navy was still the greatest in the world; they were absolute masters of the sea; and not even the Great King could prevent their vessels from sailing wherever they chose. What was the loss of houses or lands to men who possessed such a power? So long as they preserved their freedom, they could quickly recover what had been lost; but if they became the servants of others, they would lose not freedom only, but all that freedom brings with it. Their ancestors had won a great empire, were they unable even to maintain it ? Far be such a disgrace from them! It was the possession of this great empire which made the position so critical. ” Do not imagine,” Pericles said, “that you are fighting for a simple issue, freedom or slavery. You have an empire to lose; you are exposed to the hatred into which your imperial policy has brought you. Your empire is a tyranny, which in the opinion of mankind has been unjustly acquired, and which you cannot safely surrender. It is too late to play the honest man ; and those who advise such a policy will bring the state to ruin.”

“No! we must hold on our way, and tread the path of glory. Our city has the greatest name in all the world because she has never yielded to misfortunes, but has sacrificed more lives and endured severer hardships in war than any other; wherefore also she has the greatest power of any state up to this day, and the memory of her glory will always survive. Even if we shall be compelled at last to abate somewhat of our greatness (for all things have their time of growth and decay) yet will the recollection live, that of all Hellenes, we ruled over the greatest number of Hellenic subjects, that we withstood our enemies whether single or united, in the most terrible wars, and that we were the inhabitants of a city endowed with every sort of wealth and greatness. The indolent may indeed find fault, but the man of action will seek to rival us, and he who is less fortunate will envy us. To be hateful and offensive has ever been at the time the fate of those who have aspired to empire. But he judges well who accepts unpopularity in a great cause. Hatred does not last long, and, besides the immediate splendor of great actions, the renown of them endures forever in men’s memories. Looking forward to such future glory and present avoidance of dishonor, make an effort now and secure both. Let no herald be sent to the Lacedaemonians, and do not let them know that you are depressed by your sufferings. For the greatest states and the greatest men, when misfortunes come, are the least depressed in spirit and the most resolute in action.” 

Lord Acton stated, “Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In reality, power reveals the corruption already within people. Pericles, when given a choice between enjoying peace as one of the leading city-states of a free Hellas, but without absolute power, or destructive war with the possibility of becoming the most powerful city-state with absolute power, he resolutely chose the latter.

Posted in Freedom/Liberty | 27 Comments »

Viriathus: Principles & Perfidy

Posted by Orrin Woodward on November 20, 2012

I am now studying the Romans and discovered this gem of history that I hadn’t read, or at least remembered, before. This is one of the things I love most about the LIFE Business – the ability to study and grow, not just for myself, but to help others. The LIFE Founders and its community are constantly reading, listening, and associating to learn and grow. In this way, they can share what they learned with others to help everyone in the community improve. In my book RESOLVED: 13 Resolutions for LIFE, I teach on the importance of the PDCA process to constantly improve one’s skills. This PDCA process is being applied by so many in the LIFE Community, that lives are being changed daily. I sure am glad that nearly twenty years ago, Chris Brady, George Guzzardo, and I committed to stay the course and learn to build communities. Who could have known that, through that effort, we now enjoy the LIFE Business. Here is my version of powerful life story of Viriathus.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

In 160 BC, the the Roman praetor of Spain, Servius Sulspicius Galba, negotiated a peaceful surrender of 7,000 Lusitaninan (modern day Portugal) warriors. After disarming them, Galba ordered his soldiers to massacre the helpless men. Nearly all the Lusitanians died, but a few, including Viriathus, escaped into the woods. Through his bravery and first-hand account of the Romans misdeeds, Viriathus was chosen leader of his countrymen in the revolt against Roman rule of the their homeland. Galba sent the Roman commander Vetilius to capture the rebels, but Virathus had a surprise for his unsuspecting opponent. He lured the army further and further into the mountains, cut off their escape, and cut the Roman army to pieces.

Another Roman army of 4,000 men, shortly afterwards received the same treatment from the brilliant Viriathus and his desperate Lusitanian army. Indeed, for three years the Lusitanian leader overran Roman authorities, defeating legion after legion, charged with capturing the alleged outlaws. In 141 BC, Servilianus, the commander of Roman forces, was defeated and sued for peace, recognizing Lusitania as an independent state with Virathus as the Chief Magistrate. The Roman Senate was horrified and when Caepio, the brother of Servilanus, assumed command of the troops, he perfidiously broke the treaty. Not surprisingly to Viriathus, the Romans resumed hostilities against the signed treaty.

By 139 BC, Caepo, discovering he was just as helpless against the superior strategy and will of Virathus, resorted to treachery to accomplish his goal. During peace negotiations, Virathus sent his most trusted friends, Audax, Ditalco, and Minumsy, to negotiate with Caepo. Instead of negotiations, however, Caepo offered large gifts and bribes for the three men to sell out their leader. Sadly, the men chose prizes over principles and plotted the assassination of the only Spaniard to successfully withstand against Roman tyranny. Viriathus, always prepared, slept little and in his armor. In this way, when awaken, he could quickly lead his men into battle. Therefore, it was customary for his closest friends to enter his tent at night on pressing business. Audax and his associated entered the tent after Virathus fell asleep and stabbed him in the throat, the only part of his body not protected by armor. Thus, the fearless leader died, not from his Roman enemies, but from the treachery of his “friends.” Also dying were the hopes of Lusitanian freedom as the rebellion collapsed after Viriathus death and farther Spain bent its neck to the Roman yoke.

Death of Viriathus

Death of Viriathus by Jose Madrazo

Why did I share this terrible story of bad character and ethics? Simply to point out that the prizes won by the traitors are long gone, but the disloyalty lives on in infamy. Never, I repeat never, accept temporary gain for permanent harm. In reality, the three traitors, sold out the freedom of their country, their people, and killed their leader for temporary trinkets. Indeed, a person ought to sell everything he has before he sells his character, for the things can be replaced, but the character cannot. Nonetheless, many do not follow this principles and sell out the permanent for the temporary. Imagine readers, if Virathus had sent you on the peace errand. How should leaders of character respond when offered personal gain to destroy others? Let everyone examine himself.

Posted in All News, Freedom/Liberty | 43 Comments »

Five Laws of Decline & the Athenian Mind

Posted by Orrin Woodward on November 19, 2012

I am studying such an interesting period of history—about the ancient Greeks. On one hand, their love of freedom was so deep, they would sacrifice their lives to maintain it. On the other hand, their love of power was so great, they would sacrifice their lives to tyrannize others. How can both of these contrasting thoughts exist inside of one people? In truth, these thoughts exist inside all people, and this is called man’s fallen nature. Man has the capacity for the noblest and ignoblest actions within him, and the history of ancient Greece displays this clearer than practically any historical period. The goal of the LIFE business is to check the Five Laws of Decline (FLD) that I teach in my book RESOLVED: 13 Resolutions for LIFE. The reason I like that there is a group of LIFE founders (Chris Brady, Tim Marks, Claude Hamilton, Bill Lewis, George Guzzardo, Dan Hawkins, and Rob Hallstrand) is that it ensures no one has absolute power, which keeps the FLD in check. I have witnessed first hand the FLD in action, and any company not familiar with these principles is probably affected by them. Here is a portion of the research project I am working on.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

Delian LeagueIn 477 BC, the Athenians assumed command at sea, forming a league to compensate themselves and their allies for losses suffered by the Persian kings. Persian holdings and allies were successfully attacked to offset Greek losses during the war. The allies formed a synod, in which each city sent a deputy to represent its interest with an equal vote on the board. Additionally, each city pledged either ships or money to the league for its maintenance and campaigns. Aristides, the “just one,” was appointed medon of the league. His unquestioned character, holding the confidence and trust of all deputies, was essential to its early success. He was assigned to fix the “tributes,” paid by each city, that didn’t provide the assigned number of ships to the temple of Apollo at Delos. Cimon, son of Miltiades, was the most competent commander in all of Hellas. He was appointed Commander of the allied fleet. Both were men eminently fitted to make Athens popular with the allies. Furthermore, the alliance was confirmed with solemn oaths and, according to the customs of the day, by sinking of iron into the sea; until the iron bars should reappear, the oaths would be binding. Thus, the Delian League was formed and Greek freedoms were imperiled.

Aristides’ character and Cimon’s competence were an unbeatable combination, producing victories at sea while maintaining peace amongst the Delian allies. The allies, knowing the character and abilities of Aristides and Cimon didn’t worry that control of both the finances and the fighting were both in Athenian hands. They trusted the character of Aristides and the oaths taken by the allies that stated all allies were equal and suppled either ships or money for mutual defense. Cimon reeled off victory after victory against the beleaguered Persian fleet, and Aristides nobly worked with the allies to ensure fair assessments and ships were contributed by all parties. Unfortunately, the poor precedent of Athenian control over the league’s resources was set. In truth, this wasn’t a significant issue as long as Aristides and Cimon were at the helm. However, since no one can lead forever, when Aristides exited the scene, the allied mistake of surrendering complete control to one city (Athens) became apparent. However, this realization was still years in the future for Aristides & Cimon, for the most part, acted honorably towards the allies.

With Aristides and Cimon moderately running the league, many of the allies chose to pay money rather than provide ships. This worked well with character-based leaders. However, with no board to check and balance the Athenians, when new men with new motives arose, the allied reliance on the Delian League’s oaths was in vain. Words are sometimes sufficient to ensure execution, but without board oversight of political leaders, the FLD will kick in, and someone will abuse the contract for personal power. This became all too apparent for the allies during the Naxos rebellion in 470 BC. With Aristides gone, the complaints against Athenian arrogance and mismanagement grew amongst the allies. Naxos was the first to act upon these unresolved complaints, withdrawing from the league in protest. Athens assigned Cimon to blockade its former ally, thus terminating an alliance of equals and initiating the Athenian Empire. Thucydides writes, “This was the first allied State which was reduced to subjection contrary to the league constitution.” Although history has not recorded the specific grievance, this begins a new phase in the Delian League from equal allies to Athenian subjection of other Greek city-states. A generation before, Athenian men willingly sacrificed their lives for Greek freedoms; now they sacrificed their lives to tyrannize other Greeks.

Noted historian Evelyn Abbott describes the metamorphosis of the Greek mind:

A change so striking of necessity excites our curiosity; we would fain trace the steps by which it was brought about. Who was to blame for consequences so disastrous? Was it the Athenians, who in the plenitude of their power destroyed the fair promise of united action in Hellas, in order to establish a maritime empire in the place of an equal league of confederate cities? Or did the allies, in the feverish restlessness of Hellenic independence, refuse to submit to the control inseparable from any form of confederation?

Clearly, we can see the workings of the FLD in the actions of Athens. Whereas before, they fought to maintain the freedoms of the greater Hellas against the Persian oppressors, with the taste of tributes and absolute power, the Athenians transformed into the worst oppressors, hypocritically denying to other Greeks what they valued so greatly themselves.

Posted in All News, Freedom/Liberty | 34 Comments »

Winston Churchill: Big Dreams, Big Failures, & Big Accomplishments

Posted by Orrin Woodward on November 15, 2012

The following is another research assignment I have been working on. One of the cool things about owning a leadership and personal development company (LIFE Business) is that I am constantly working upon projects personally and professionally. In other words, one cannot develop others in an area he isn’t developing himself. I am excited about the lessons learned from Churchill’s life and want to share them with you.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

In World War I, the Germans and Austrian pushed the much larger Russian army back towards Moscow, eventually forcing the Russians to sue for peace and launching Lenin on his communist misdeeds. The success of the Germans and Austrians against the numerically greater Russian army was due to two main factors:

1. The superiority of the German strategy
2. The inferiority of the Russian equipment

The first factor was unchangeable from the Allied perspective; however, the second factor could have been altered if only England had followed the advice of its young First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill. In fact, Churchill, alone among the statesmen and generals of the First World War, bore the distinct marks of genius in his global-vision of the war.

Churchill had perceived the Russians, despite their superior numbers, would be no match for the double-barreled benefits of strategy and equipment held by the Germans. Churchill was the first to see that England had to deliver better equipment to Russia or lose the Russians to a separate peace. However, the only effective way to deliver equipment to the Russians was through the Black Sea currently blocked by the Turkish enemy at Constantinople. Taking Constantinople would accomplish several strategic benefits in one stroke. First, it would all-but eliminate Turkey from the Central powers alliance. Second, it would ensure the safety of the Orient and third would likely secure additional countries to the allied cause. With Constantinople in Allied hands, arms and ammunitions could be shipped through the Black Sea to Russia, Turkey would sue for peace, and Rumania, Bulgaria, along with Greece would most likely join with Serbia on the allied side and march against Austria.  Three dominoes, in other words, would fall by knocking over one.

Unfortunately, as is the price of genius, smaller minds with smaller conceptions could not see the big picture. Churchill, Field Marshall Kitchener, and Sea Lord Fisher were all for the plan; however, the British government was reluctant to support such a daring venture. Validating again that half-hearted measures committed to half-heartedly rarely produce the desired results, the British set up committees to discuss strategies. Not surprisingly, the committee delayed its final decision destroying proportionally the element of surprise for every month of delay. Additionally, the British resolved to strike quickly and resolutely was tamed through the committees less courageous members. Although the operation was neither simple nor straightforward, the strategic advantages obtained through proper execution should have overcome British reluctance. Nonetheless, the committee dithered away its strategic initiative, eventually agreeing to an invasion with too few ships, men, and resolved to complete the task.

Gallipoli CampaignOne of the British concerns was the possibility of their ships penned within the Dardanelles channel – 37 miles long and only 2 1/2 miles wide, connecting Constantinople with the Mediterranean Sea. The northern shore was called the Gallipoli peninsula and on the southern shore lay Asia Minor.  War demands risk and the rewards, in this case, were certainly worth the risk.  Remarkably, even with the delays, the British still caught the Turks unprepared and acted upon quickly would have changed the course of the war. Instead, lacking courage, initiative, and resolve, the British suffered one of the greatest setbacks of the First World War, sacrificing tens of thousands of men on the altar of committee leadership. Sea Lord Fisher, in frustration at the committee, had written to Churchill that never in world history had a committee won a victory; one man was needed. One man, in other words, with the courage to lead. In contrast, the British received numerous second-guessed decisions leading to one disaster after another. Practically every conceivable mistake imaginable ensued during the Battle of Gallipoli, costing men’s lives through lack of leadership.

England’s first mistake occurred when, contrary to Churchill’s pleas, the English warships bombarded only the outlying forts, giving the Turks advance notice of an impending invasion. In response, 60,000 Turkish men entered the peninsula with the German General Liman von Sanders assigned to command the troops. After a further month long delay, giving the Turks plenty of time to prepare, sixteen British and French ships attempted to force the Dardanelles entrance. The ships had an overwhelming superiority in guns over the resisting forts (58 to 18), but the forts maintained stiff resistance, preventing the Allies from clearing the floating mines at the inlet. Three battleships were sunk outright and three others were badly damaged causing the British squadron to retreat. Strikingly, although the Allies lost a few ships, they were on the verge of a major victory. The Turkish guns had only 8 shots left for each cannon and all of the available mines had already been laid in the straits. Because the chances of procuring more ammunition and mines was slim to none, the Turks contemplated surrender, but received a reprieve with the Allied retreat. In truth, the premature disengagement by the Allied fleet changed Britain’s greatest victory into its greatest defeats of the war.

General von Sanders intuition, that the British would attempt troop landings on the Gallipoli peninsula to breakthrough through the Dardanelles entrance was accurate. He exclaimed, “If only they give me a week’s time!” The British Cabinet, more than complied with his wish. Thus, the second big mistake of the Gallipoli campaign – political infighting leading to costly delays of the troop landings. In essence, the loss of the battleships hurt the pride and prestige of the British Navy, increasing resistance and decreasing the resolve to complete the campaign. Committee members, attempting to save their political skin, placed the blame on anything and everything outside of themselves. The Army and Navy bickered back and forth and the troops invasion date was delayed several times in the process. Finally, a full month too late, 50,000 men landed in Gallipoli and upon the Asia Minor coast. General von Sanders, by now amply prepared, met the invaders with stubborn resistance on all fronts. The attackers, with heavy casualties, progressed no further than three miles inland and stalled. Despite Gallipoli being no more than three miles wide and thirty miles long, the British lacked the leadership resolve to complete its bold undertaking.

The coup-de-grace was reached when, instead of firing the committee, Churchill was relieved of his post and sent into early retirement. Apparently, bureaucratic committees. rather than accept responsibility, choose instead the political short-sighted measure of shooting its best men with the best ideas. Churchill would be persona-non-grata for over twenty years and Russia would sue for a separate peace with the Germans. This was Churchill’s reward for daring to think boldly in a time of war. The lesson here is clear, namely, the greatest minds with the greatest ideas will be snubbed by the smallest minds with the smallest ideas. Leaders must be prepared for this. Fortunately, Churchill bided his time until his genius blossomed before the world during his courageous stand against Hitler in World War II. When a person with big ideas strives to do his personal best, he must expect to meet with the resistance of smaller people with smaller ideas. Nonetheless, a person must never drop his dream to fit in with the crowd. This, in fact, is one of the big secrets of success for Churchill’s life. He had big dreams, big failures, and big accomplishments and it was the courage of his convictions that maintained his equanimity during each phase. Learn from his life the value of following one’s dream, knowing that the failures on the journey only strengthen the character and resolve one will need when his moment of destiny arrives.

Posted in Freedom/Liberty, Leadership/Personal Development | 29 Comments »

Hannibal Barca: Purpose Determines Destiny

Posted by Orrin Woodward on November 14, 2012

I have been working on a couple research projects for future books when Hannibal’s story struck me so much that I decided to share it with my readers. In my book RESOLVED: 13 Resolutions for LIFE, the first resolution in on the subject of purpose, namely, because one’s purpose determines one’s destiny. As I reflect on my life, every decision has followed naturally from my God-given purpose to reach millions of people with Truth. Some of the decisions have been tough, but absolutely necessary if I intended to fulfill what I believe God has called me to do. In reality, without a purpose, a person is similar to a boat sailing in a sea with no rudder. It just goes with the wind, not towards any intended target. Everyone has a choice on what to do with his or her life, but as for me, I intend to follow my purpose to my destiny. The LIFE Business reaching millions of people is my destiny and I intend to fulfill my destiny one family or one person at a time.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

Hannibal’s Pledge

Hamilcar Barca, commander of the Carthaginian forces defeated in the first Punic war vowed to have his revenge. Having lost Sicily, Corsica, and Sardinia, Hamilcar was assigned to defend the Carthaginian territories of Spain, accompanied by his nine-year old son, Hannibal. Vowing revenge, Hamilcar brought his young son to an altar and made him stretch his hand over the fresh sacrifice to pledge undying hatred and enmity against the Romans. Indeed, this was an oath that Hannibal fulfilled to his last dying breath.

Crossing the Alps

Hannibal Barca Invasion RouteHannibal’s father died when he was 18 years old. By 26, Hannibal had succeeded his brother-in-law as leader and commander of the Carthaginian forces in Spain. Exercising all his mental and physical talents to fulfill the oath promised to his dad, Hannibal built a powerful army and developed a daring plan to strike a blow at his hated Romans rivals. As part of his total strategy, Hannibal befriended the Gallic tribes that controlled the passes over the Alps. Soon afterwards, he besieged the city of Saguntum in northern Spain. Despite being 100 miles south of the border between Carthaginian and Roman territory, Saguntum was considered an ally of Rome, thus initiating the Second Punic War. Rome didn’t fear anyone, especially since they controlled the sea lanes and knew Hannibal could never transport an army of the needed size across the Mediterranean Sea without risk of annihilation by the stronger Roman fleets.

Consequently, Hannibal moved his troops, consisting of nearly 50,000 men and around 40 elephants, north into France and eventually over the passes of the Alps into Italy. No one had dared such an audacious plan before and it caught the Romans completely by surprise. Leaving his brother Hasdrubal to defend Spain, Hannibal’s expected to raise further troops from disgruntle allies of the mighty Roman empire. In concept it was a brilliant plan; however in execution many of his men and nearly all of his elephants died on the journey. In fact, Hannibal, exhausted and feverish, lost sight in one of his eyes on the journey. Remarkably, only 20,000 of the original 50,000 departing men arrived on Italian soil, yet Hannibal refused to yield to circumstances. He was determined and to fulfill his vow by inspiring his men with thoughts of taking down the growing Roman Empire.

Battles in Italy

Hannibal’s army rallied to his call and he defeated the first Roman army sent against him at the River Trebia. Enticing the Romans into crossing a waist-deep frigid stream, Hannibal’s men defeated the exhausted Romans. The next battle, at a narrow pass between Lake Tasimene and the mountains, Hannibal’s strategy of hiding his calvary until it fell upon the Roman rearguard, pinched the Romans and ended in another victory for Hannibal’s outnumbered troops. After various delaying tactics by the Roman general Fabius, the Romans decided on a final all-out offensive to rid themselves of the pesky invader. At Cannae, Hannibal’s strategy achieved, not just a victory in battle, but everlasting fame as one of the classic maneuvers in military history. Using superior discipline, Hannibal’s middle gave ground while his wings swept forward, leaving the Roman’s surrounded as they surged into the middle gap and the wings closed in upon them. The massacre of tens of thousands of Romans left Hannibal in charge of the Italian countryside and no Roman army ever fought a pitched battle against Hannibal again on the Italian mainland.

Hannibal’s Recall

Amazingly, however, Rome still refused to surrender. Hannibal, although victorious on the battlefield, did not feel he could conquer the city of Rome with its strong fortifications. Consequently, the Fabian Roman tactics of attrition warfare led to the demoralization of morale and men in the Carthaginian army. Hannibal had counted upon reinforcements from discontented allies; however, most of the allies remained loyal to Rome rather than join in rebellion. Between Rome’s naval supremacy and the inherent dangers of the mountain passes, Hannibal reinforcements were few, while Rome continued to rebuild its army to defeat the invader. Finally, to break the deadlock, Scipio, in a brilliant maneuver, attacked the Carthaginians in Africa, thus forcing the recall of Hannibal’s army. Strikingly, the Romans had survived the greatest threat to their empire until its eventual collapse 600 years later.

In 202 BC, at Zama, in south-west Carthage, Hannibal was finally defeated. Rome’s victory over Carthage ensured Roman supremacy in the Mediterranean waters. Shortly afterwards, Hannibal, upon learning his enemies in Carthage intended to turn him over to Rome, went to exile where he eventually killed himself rather than surrender to Roman forces intent upon his capture. A sad ending to one of the best generals and leaders of all-time.

Hannibal’s somber story makes one reflect upon the importance the driving force in one’s life. His vow led to his destiny – a series of battles against Rome – leading ultimately to his exile and death. Hannibal was brave, courageous, and focused in the pursuit of his purpose, but the question is: was it a worthy purpose?  Invariably, one’s purpose determines one’s destiny. Consequently, it’s important to determine what one is called to do and then do it with all one’s might. Hannibal, because of his passion to pursue his purpose, nearly defeated the mighty Roman empire. Knowing the importance of purpose in one’s life, perhaps its worth investing the time to detect the God-given purpose inside and resolve to courageously pursue it for the Glory of God.

Posted in All News, Freedom/Liberty | 32 Comments »

Ancient Greece: Concord to Chaos

Posted by Orrin Woodward on October 31, 2012

 

Greeks & Persians at Marathon

Here is some research I am doing on the ancient Greeks and their love of freedom. How a small band of freedom-loving people stood and conquered the mighty Persian empire only to destroy one another in bloody civil wars is one of the keys to political science. In fact, the Five Laws of Decline (FLD), which I teach in my Top 100 All-Time Best Leadership Book RESOLVED: 13 Resolutions for LIFE, predict the downfall of the Greeks.  The goal of the LIFE business is to prohibit the growth of the FLD through a performance-based culture where no special deals are allowed. Everyone is paid as they perform—period!

Harry Truman once said, “There is nothing new under the sun, only the history you do not know.” One of our goals in LIFE is to learn and apply the lessons of history so we don’t repeat its mistakes. Enjoy the article and please share how you avoid the growth of the Five Laws of Decline in your company.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

In 481 BC, 10,000 Athenian warriors at Marathon blocked a Persian army rumored to be over 100,000 strong. Indeed, the Persians were the conquering force of the ancient world, having amassed an empire that included modern day Iran, Iraq, Israel, Egypt, Libya, Turkey, and many more. In contrast, the entire Greek peninsula and islands added together are about 2/3 the size of Portugal. Moreover, the Persians were believed to be invincible in military expeditions, having recently conquered the Ionian Greeks (on the western tip of modern day Turkey) before invading the Greek mainland. In fact, no Greek state had successfully withstood the advance of Persia and many of the mainland Greek states had succumbed to the “earth and water” tribute demanded by Persia signifying Greek subjection to the Persian King. Nonetheless, the Athenian hoplites marched over 26 miles to the plains of Marathon to defend their precious freedoms from Persian tyranny while their families awaited word in Athens.

The ancient Greeks are unique when compared to the Asian people of Persia and Egypt. In truth, the “earth and water” demanded by the Persian King wasn’t entirely unpalatable, allowing the Greeks to live peacefully if they paid their tax tribute and provided military help when the Persian King desired to conquer more territory. While many races and countries chose enslavement and peace, the Greeks, led by Sparta and Athens, chose liberty or death. Politically, because of the unique geography of Greece – no navigable rivers and mountains physically separating communities – instead of one national government ruling over smaller units of sovereignty, Greece consisted of numerous city-state sovereignties that confederated together for defense, religious ceremonies, and sporting competitions. While the rest of the world worshiped God-like kings, surrendering their freedoms like ants within a colony. The Greeks, who lived too close to their kings to be fooled, pledged loyalty instead to their cities and structured monarchies, aristocracies, or even democracies for the benefit of the polis, not the political leader. By separating their religion from their King, the Greeks began to see each other as equals before the city-state’s laws, not serfs before God’s regent on earth. The effect of this revolutionary mindset is what led the Athenian’s to fight at Marathon. In other words, they valued their freedoms more than they valued living under slavery.

The Athenian Greeks defeated the Persians on the plains of Marathon, thanks to the courageous leadership of Miltiades.  Several years later, the Greeks confederation defeated the Persians again in the naval battle at Salamis, capitalizing on the leadership strategy of another Athenian hero, Themistocles. Rarely, does one find a people like the Athenians, who willingly surrendered their city to Persian destruction, taking the citizens to the island of Salamis and the men into the ships to defend their city-less country. The Greeks didn’t just speak about the value of freedom; they lived it out in their lives. With the final defeat of the Persians on the Boetian plains, led by the Spartan King Pausanius, the Greeks were finally safe from Persian tyranny. Freedom loving people conquered against overwhelming odds thanks to great courage, leadership, and strategy. But this happy story doesn’t end so well. The Greeks, who had so bravely united to defend Greece, ended up destroying one another in a series of fratricidal wars that left mainland Greece exhausted and vulnerable to Macedonian empire building.

What went wrong? How could a people who valued freedom so highly destroy one another, consequently, losing their freedom? The answer is the Five Laws of Decline. The Greeks were the first people to quest after political concord. History has proven concord is a difficult objective since it lies between the Scylla and Charybdis, rocks of chaos on one side and coercion on the other. Before Greece, the history of human civilization is a litany of kings using absolute power to enforce obedient submission of his subjects or lack of absolute power creating chaos and war until a King built enough power to rule his subjects again. Accordingly, in studying the Greek failures, keep in mind that, in the history of the West, this was the first community to attempt a political solution of concord between chaos and coercion. With no historical precedents before them, the Greeks sailed blindly into uncharted seas, confident that they could solve human civilization’s dilemma. After all, hadn’t they just defeated an alleged invincible power and displayed a fierce defense of freedom and all it entails?

Posted in Freedom/Liberty | 44 Comments »

G.K. Chesterton: Pagans and Christians

Posted by Orrin Woodward on October 18, 2012

Last night, while doing some research on the Greeks for a future book, my mind kept ruminating on Solomon’s statement “vanity of vanities” as I read the history of the Greek’s self-destruction. While pondering human sinfulness, I started to read the last article in a book of essays on the genius of the Greeks. Even though I had no idea who the author was when I started reading, within minutes I knew this writer viewed the intellectual landscape from a different perspective than the rest of the essays. The whole book was fascinating, but the last article, by G.K. Chesterton, blew me away. Remarkably, in less than 3,000 words, he summed up what I was wrestling with, capturing the similarities, as well as the differences, between the best of the Pagan past and the Christian future.

Indeed, most of the authors raved about the greatness of the Greeks, and truth be told, there is much to admire and respect. Still, when one methodically analyzes the Greeks’ dreams in comparison to their historical realities, it’s enough to make the most optimistic of leaders (me) suffer from temporary melancholia. 🙂 In a nutshell, Greek society’s apex was the united city-states defeat of the previously invincible Persian Empire. Unfortunately, however, after a thirty-year Periclean peace, the rest of Greek history is one long series of fratricidal wars, ending with the Roman Conquest and Pax Romana. In consequence, some of the greatest mental achievements (in philosophy, politics, science, theater, etc.) in the world’s history were accomplished in the midst of the mass destruction of the very civilization responsible for their creation.

Needless to say, Chesterton’s article was a breath of fresh air, helping me sort out the gap between the Greek dreams and the Greek realities. Why is this important? Because the LIFE business has big dreams as well. One of my reasons for reading about past leaders and cultures is to learn lessons from their example so I don’t have to repeat the same mistakes. Yesterday, Chris Brady and I discussed how much one can learn by simply reading, listening, and associating. 🙂 Without any further ado, here is the first of several posts on Chesterton’s Pagans and Christians.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

The real difference between Paganism and Christianity is perfectly summed up in the difference between the pagan, or natural, virtues, and those three virtues of Christianity which the Church of Rome calls virtues of grace. The pagan, or rational, virtues are such things as justice and temperance, and Christianity has adopted them. The three mystical virtues which Christianity has not adopted, but invented, are faith, hope, and charity. Now much easy and foolish Christian rhetoric could easily be poured out upon those three words, but I desire to confine myself to the two facts which are evident about them. The first evident fact (in marked contrast to the delusion of the dancing pagan)—the first evident fact, I say, is that the pagan virtues, such as justice and temperance, are the sad virtues, and that the mystical virtues of faith, hope, and charity are the gay and exuberant virtues. And the second evident fact, which is even more evident, is the fact that the pagan virtues are the reasonable virtues, and that the Christian virtues of faith, hope, and charity are in their essence as unreasonable as they can be.

As the word “unreasonable” is open to misunderstanding, the matter may be more accurately put by saying that each one of these Christian or mystical virtues involves a paradox in its own nature, and that this is not true of any of the typically pagan or rationalist virtues. Justice consists in finding out a certain thing due to a certain man and giving it to him. Temperance consists in finding out the proper limit of a particular indulgence and adhering to that. But charity means pardoning what is unpardonable, or it is no virtue at all. Hope means hoping when things are hopeless, or it is no virtue at all. And faith means believing the incredible, or it is no virtue at all.

It is somewhat amusing, indeed, to notice the difference between the fate of these three paradoxes in the fashion of the modern mind. Charity is a fashionable virtue in our time; it is lit up by the gigantic firelight of Dickens. Hope is a fashionable virtue to-day; our attention has been arrested for it by the sudden and silver trumpet of Stevenson. But faith is unfashionable, and it is customary on every side to cast against it the fact that it is a paradox. Everybody mockingly repeats the famous childish definition that faith is “the power of believing that which we know to be untrue.” Yet it is not one atom more paradoxical than hope or charity. Charity is the power of defending that which we know to be indefensible. Hope is the power of being cheerful in circumstances which we know to be desperate. It is true that there is a state of hope which belongs to bright prospects and the morning; but that is not the virtue of hope. The virtue of hope exists only in earthquake and eclipse. It is true that there is a thing crudely called charity, which means charity to the deserving poor; but charity to the deserving is not charity at all, but justice. It is the undeserving who require it, and the ideal either does not exist at all, or exists wholly for them. For practical purposes it is at the hopeless moment that we require the hopeful man, and the virtue either does not exist at all, or begins to exist at that moment. Exactly at the instant when hope ceases to be reasonable it begins to be useful.

Now the old pagan world went perfectly straightforward until it discovered that going straightforward is an enormous mistake. It was nobly and beautifully reasonable, and discovered in its death-pang this lasting and valuable truth, a heritage for the ages, that reasonableness will not do. The pagan age was truly an Eden or golden age, in this essential sense, that it is not to be recovered. And it is not to be recovered in this sense again that, while we are certainly jollier than the pagans, and much more right than the pagans, there is not one of us who can, by the utmost stretch of energy, be so sensible as the pagans. That naked innocence of the intellect cannot be recovered by any man after Christianity; and for this excellent reason, that every man after Christianity knows it to be misleading.

Let me take an example, the first that occurs to the mind, of this impossible plainness in the pagan point of view. The greatest tribute to Christianity in the modern world is Tennyson’s “Ulysses.” The poet reads into the story of Ulysses the conception of an incurable desire to wander. But the real Ulysses does not desire to wander at all. He desires to get home. He displays his heroic and unconquerable qualities in resisting the misfortunes which baulk him; but that is all. There is no love of adventure for its own sake; that is a Christian product. There is no love of Penelope for her own sake; that is a Christian product. Everything in that old world would appear to have been clean and obvious. A good man was a good man; a bad man was a bad man. For this reason they had no charity; for charity is a reverent agnosticism towards the complexity of the soul. For this reason they had no such thing as the art of fiction, the novel; for the novel is a creation of the mystical idea of charity. For them a pleasant landscape was pleasant, and an unpleasant landscape unpleasant. Hence they had no idea of romance; for romance consists in thinking a thing more delightful because it is dangerous; it is a Christian idea. In a word, we cannot reconstruct or even imagine the beautiful and astonishing pagan world. It was a world in which common sense was really common.

Posted in Faith, Freedom/Liberty | 23 Comments »

1913 and America’s Lost Freedoms

Posted by Orrin Woodward on August 31, 2012

The year of lost freedoms.

1913, Oliver DeMille’s new book, is a fascinating study of a crucial year and the changes wrought upon our government by the political leaders of that time. Indeed, it can be said that no year is as important for American freedoms as 1913. Oliver DeMille articulates, in a clear, concise, and comprehendible style, the three key changes that occurred in 1913 along with the later Supreme Court decision that solidified the governmental revolution. I believe that Oliver DeMille is one of only a handful of men and women in America today that grasp the Founding Generation’s original intentions and principles. Anyone concerned about the freedoms lost since 1913 ought to read and reread this book and share it with others!

Just as fish need water in order to survive, entrepreneurs need freedom in order to weigh choices, develop plans, and execute strategies. However, when a government destroys the liberty of the people by assuming too much power and control, the entrepreneurs are destroyed and, thus, the engine of all true economic growth. This isn’t a hypothesis or a pet belief of mine or Oliver’s, but a historical reality proven numerous times over the last several millennia. For instance, look what happened to the entrepreneurs in the Roman Empire, the British Empire, the Soviet Empire, and now, sadly, the American Empire. In truth, empires historically have sacrificed the freedoms of the masses for the power of the few.

Have you read 1913 yet? What were your thoughts on Oliver’s new book? What part can you play in educating the West on its lost freedoms? If you haven’t read it, then get over to the LIFE site and pick it up today!

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

Posted in Freedom/Liberty | Tagged: , | 47 Comments »

Tony & Sharon Hoffman – Freedom Day

Posted by Orrin Woodward on July 8, 2012

Tony and Sharon Hoffman have earned their freedom through faith, hard work, and perseverance. Few couples have worked as hard as Tony and Sharon to get free from their jobs in order to pursue their destiny. Recently achieving Round Table level, Tony ended his employment as a school vice-principal and is now focused on going Policy Council. The LIFE Business is changing people lives through world-class success training. The compensated community is getting people job-optional and the leaders are changing communities one person at a time.

The dream is alive and well for those who build depth, build numbers, and build volume though power-player. What dream is alive in your soul? Isn’t it time you lived the life you always wanted? Here is a wonderful video that Denny Smith made of Tony’s freedom day. Can you imagine your freedom day? Make 2012 your year.

Sincerely,

Orrin Woodward

Posted in Freedom/Liberty | 68 Comments »