Stuart, Florida is the sailfish capital of the world. Captain Bill and I are headed out this morning on our quest to catch the monster sailfish. We have fished several times for sailfish, but have been unsuccessful so far. We applied the Plan-Do-Check and Adjust to our methods and are back at it today. I will let you know how it goes. We have the dream to catch the big one and must persist until the dream is accomplished. That is what life is about – get a big dream, PDCA, surround yourself with other dreamers, celebrate one another’s success. Life is too short to be a victim, complain about your circumstances, or focus on past failures. Today is a new day and your sailfish (dream) is waiting for you to sieze the moment! God Bless, Orrin Woodward
Archive for the ‘Freedom/Liberty’ Category
Without freedom, there is no leadership.
Stuart, Florida – SailFishing
Posted by Orrin Woodward on January 23, 2009
Posted in Freedom/Liberty, Fun | Comments Off on Stuart, Florida – SailFishing
Milton Friedman – Free to Choose
Posted by Orrin Woodward on December 29, 2008
Milton Friedman is another famous economist with a critical message for our generation. Milton and his wife Rose both taught the importance of freedom for the individual in making economic choices. A video series was produced based upon their best selling book Freedom to Choose. Here is the first video in the series. I particularly like the introduction from Arnold Schwarzenegger as he describes why he wanted to come to America. America has always been the beacon of freedom and hope for the rest of the world and we must not lose this on our watch. God Bless, Orrin Woodward
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKbHA76-Hi0]
Posted in Finances, Freedom/Liberty | 3 Comments »
America & Free Trade
Posted by Orrin Woodward on December 27, 2008
I have been asked my thoughts on free trade numerous times. I believe the World is Flat as Thomas Friedman says and that America must learn to compete with the world. Protectionism does not work and we know this from the world of sports. Can you imagine going to the Olympics and learning that certain countries were penalized for being too competent? The Olympic ideal is may the best person win and the best country win. In economic parlance, their win does not have to be another countries loss. Adam Smith, at the time of the American Revolution, clearly spelled out the advantages of specialization and economies of scale in his Wealth of Nations. America must not fear other countries, but embrace a win-win trading policy with other countries.
David Ricardo shared the concept of Comparative Advantage that is essential for the specialization between trading partners. As I began my research for this paper, I realized that Alan S. Binder had already captured all the essentials in his excellent article. I will share his well researched and reasoned article with you. Great job Professor Binder in providing quality information that is explained simply. America must remain free for the best entrepreneurs to try different ideas and processes to satisfy customers’ wants. Every time we lose freedom, we lose the ability to compete. Let’s replace fear with hunger to learn and grow. Chris Brady and I wrote our WSJ #1 Best Seller, Launching a Leadership Revolution to encourage all people from every country to grow personally and be part of the global community. God Bless, Orrin Woodward
About the Author:
Alan S. Blinder is the Gordon S. Rentschler Memorial Professor of Economics at Princeton University. He wrote, from 1985 to 1992, a regular economics column for Business Week and is the coauthor of one of the best-selling textbooks on economics. He has served as vice chairman of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors and as a member of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers.
For more than two centuries economists have steadfastly promoted free trade among nations as the best trade policy. Despite this intellectual barrage, many “practical” men and women continue to view the case for free trade skeptically, as an abstract argument made by ivory tower economists with, at most, one foot on terra firma. These practical people “know” that our vital industries must be protected from foreign competition.
The divergence between economists’ beliefs and those of (even well-educated) men and women on the street seems to arise in making the leap from individuals to nations. In running our personal affairs, virtually all of us exploit the advantages of free trade and comparative advantage without thinking twice. For example, many of us have our shirts laundered at professional cleaners rather than wash and iron them ourselves. Anyone who advised us to “protect” ourselves from the “unfair competition” of low-paid laundry workers by doing our own wash would be thought looney. Common sense tells us to make use of companies that specialize in such work, paying them with money we earn doing something we do better. We understand intuitively that cutting ourselves off from specialists can only lower our standard of living.
Adam Smith ’s insight was that precisely the same logic applies to nations. Here is how he put it in 1776:
It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy.. . . If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry, employed in a way in which we have some advantage.
Spain, South Korea, and a variety of other countries manufacture shoes more cheaply than America can. They offer them for sale to us. Shall we buy them, as we buy the services of laundry workers, with money we earn doing things we do well—like writing computer software and growing wheat? Or shall we keep “cheap foreign shoes” out and purchase more expensive American shoes instead? It is pretty clear that the nation as a whole must be worse off if foreign shoes are kept out—even though the American shoe industry will be better off.
Most people accept this argument. But they worry about what happens if another country—say, China—can make everything, or almost everything, cheaper than we can. Will free trade with China then lead to unemployment for American workers, who will find themselves unable to compete with cheaper Chinese labor? The answer (see comparative advantage), which was provided by david ricardo in 1810, is no. To see why, let us once again appeal to our personal affairs.
Some lawyers are better typists than their secretaries. Should such a lawyer fire his secretary and do his own typing? Not likely. Though the lawyer may be better than the secretary at both arguing cases and typing, he will fare better by concentrating his energies on the practice of law and leaving the typing to a secretary. Such specialization not only makes the economy more efficient but also gives both lawyer and secretary productive work to do.
The same idea applies to nations. Suppose the Chinese could manufacture everything more cheaply than we can—which is certainly not true. Even in this worst-case scenario, there will of necessity be some industries in which China has an overwhelming cost advantage (say, toys) and others in which its cost advantage is slight (say, computers). Under free trade the United States will produce most of the computers, China will produce most of the toys, and the two nations will trade. The two countries, taken together, will get both products cheaper than if each produced them at home to meet all of its domestic needs. And, what is also important, workers in both countries will have jobs.
Many people are skeptical about this argument for the following reason. Suppose the average American worker earns twenty dollars per hour while the average Chinese worker earns just two dollars per hour. Won’t free trade make it impossible to defend the higher American wage? Won’t there instead be a leveling down until, say, both American and Chinese workers earn eleven dollars per hour? The answer, once again, is no. And specialization is part of the reason.
If there were only one industry and occupation in which people could work, then free trade would indeed force American wages close to Chinese levels if Chinese workers were as good as Americans. But modern economies are composed of many industries and occupations. If America concentrates its employment where it does best, there is no reason why American wages cannot remain far above Chinese wages for a long time—even though the two nations trade freely. A country’s wage level depends fundamentally on the productivity of its labor force, not on its trade policy. As long as American workers remain more skilled and better educated, work with more capital, and use superior technology, they will continue to earn higher wages than their Chinese counterparts. If and when these advantages end, the wage gap will disappear. Trade is a mere detail that helps ensure that American labor is employed where, in Adam Smith’s phrase, it has some advantage.
Those who are still not convinced should recall that China’s trade surplus with the United States has been widening precisely as the wage gap between the two countries, while still huge, has been narrowing. If cheap Chinese labor was stealing American jobs, why did the theft intensify as the wage gap fell? The answer, of course, is that Chinese productivity was growing at enormous rates. The remarkable upward march of Chinese productivity both raised Chinese wages relative to American wages and turned China into a world competitor. To think that we can forestall the inevitable by closing our borders is to participate in a cruel self-deception. Nor should there be any worry about failing to forestall the inevitable. The fact that another country becomes wealthier does not mean that Americans must become poorer.
Americans should appreciate the benefits of free trade more than most people, for we inhabit the greatest free-trade zone in the world. Michigan manufactures cars; New York provides banking; Texas pumps oil and gas. The fifty states trade freely with one another, and that helps them all enjoy great prosperity. Indeed, one reason why the United States did so much better economically than Europe for more than two centuries is that America had free movement of goods and services while the European countries “protected” themselves from their neighbors. To appreciate the magnitudes involved, try to imagine how much your personal standard of living would suffer if you were not allowed to buy any goods or services that originated outside your home state.
A slogan occasionally seen on bumper stickers argues, “Buy American, save your job.” This is grossly misleading for two main reasons. First, the costs of saving jobs in this particular way are enormous. Second, it is doubtful that any jobs are actually saved in the long run.
Many estimates have been made of the cost of “saving jobs” by protectionism. While the estimates differ widely across industries, they are almost always much larger than the wages of the protected workers. For example, one study in the early 1990s estimated that U.S. consumers paid $1,285,000 annually for each job in the luggage industry that was preserved by barriers to imports, a sum that greatly exceeded the average earnings of a luggage worker. That same study estimated that restricting foreign imports cost $199,000 annually for each textile worker’s job that was saved, $1,044,000 for each softwood lumber job saved, and $1,376,000 for every job saved in the benzenoid chemical industry. Yes, $1,376,000 a year!
While Americans may be willing to pay a price to save jobs, spending such enormous sums is plainly irrational. If you doubt that, imagine making the following offer to any benzenoid chemical worker who lost his job to foreign competition: we will give you severance pay of $1,376,000—not annually, but just once—in return for a promise never to seek work in the industry again. Can you imagine any worker turning down the offer? Is that not sufficient evidence that our present method of saving jobs is mad?
But the situation is actually worse, for a little deeper thought leads us to question whether any jobs are really saved overall. It is more likely that protectionist policies save some jobs by jeopardizing others. Why? First, protecting one American industry from foreign competition imposes higher costs on others. For example, quotas on imports of semiconductors sent the prices of memory chips skyrocketing in the 1980s, thereby damaging the computer industry. Steel quotas force U.S. automakers to pay more for materials, making them less competitive.
Second, efforts to protect favored industries from foreign competition may induce reciprocal actions in other countries, thereby limiting American access to foreign markets. In that case, export industries pay the price for protecting import-competing industries.
Third, there are the little-understood, but terribly important, effects of trade barriers on the value of the dollar. If we successfully restrict imports, Americans will spend less on foreign goods. With fewer dollars offered for sale on the world’s currency markets, the value of the dollar will rise relative to that of other currencies. At that point unprotected industries will start to suffer because a higher dollar makes U.S. goods less competitive in world markets. Once again, America’s ability to export is harmed.
On balance the conclusion seems clear and compelling: while protectionism is sold as job saving, it probably really amounts to job swapping. It protects jobs in some industries only by destroying jobs in others.
Posted in Finances, Freedom/Liberty | Comments Off on America & Free Trade
George W. Bush – Abandoning Free Enterprise to Save it?
Posted by Orrin Woodward on December 23, 2008
Here is a question to all the thinkers on this blog. What is wrong with the thinking on this video? I will share my thoughts when I have a little free time. God Bless, Orrin Woodward
Great job to all the commenters. You have nailed the key points! How can you abandon your principles to save your principles. I respect George W. Bush and I believe that he is doing his personal best, but I cannot sit by and let this thinking go unquestioned. The Republican party has lost its way. Similar to the split in the part when Barry Goldwater and Nelson Rockefeller were fighting for party leadership. Republicans are terrible me-too Democrats and must quit trying to play that role. Republicans must go back and read the history of their party during the 1960’s if they wish to be relevant in the 21st century. History is repeating itself again. The Great Depression has been aptly explained by Murray Rothbard in his book with that title. Government abandons Free enterprise is principles, socialism doesn’t work and government’s answer is to abandon free enterprise even further. It is like taking a healthy patient; drugging them to “improve their life”, realizing the drug has bad side effects, and drugging them further to “save” the patient. Here are some other future quotes if this thinking goes on unchecked.
1. We have abandoned chastity to save our purity.
2. We have abandoned faithfulness to save our faith.
3. We have abandoned our wealth creating principles to save our wealth.
4. We have abandoned our Christian principles to save Christianity.
5. We have abandoned defense of our country to save our country.
6. We have abandoned our our families to save our families.
7. We have abandoned thinking to save our thoughts.
8. We have abandoned convictions to save our character.
9. We have abandoned belief to save us from unbelief.
10. We have abandoned holiness principles to save holiness.
11. We have abandoned the principles of leadership to save our leadership.
12. We have abandoned our brains to save our butts.
Posted in Faith, Family, Finances, Freedom/Liberty | Comments Off on George W. Bush – Abandoning Free Enterprise to Save it?
Government Spending, Keynesian Economics, & Political Responsibility
Posted by Orrin Woodward on December 18, 2008
Since World War II, Keynesian economics has been the main current in economic thought in America. I have taught that “Ideas have Consequences” for years and we are now reaping the bitter harvest of this poor set of ideas. Anyone that would take a cursory look at the economic indicators and our government’s budget would have to admit something has gone drastically wrong since World War II. Deficit spending has skyrocketed; savings for Americans are at all-time low numbers, government spending makes up 25% plus of our economy and many more. The numbers are a dismal reminder that no one can overturn economic law, not even the largest government in the world. America’s politicians have been on a spending spree since WWII and have financed it with the American taxpayers’ money. Marrying a defective economics system that glorifies government spending with power hungry politicians that are looking for any excuse to spend our money is a recipe for disaster.
Why is it that every responsible American family must balance their budget monthly or run the risk of serious consequences, but our elected officials cannot seem to master this standard requirement? Chris Brady did a post on the 545 people that are responsible to run our government. He attached some thoughts by Charlie Reese
There are one hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices. A total of 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.
Are you telling me that in America, there is not 545 people who can learn to balance the budget and tell their constituents, no, when they have to? You cannot have the proverbial cake and eat it too. The government continues to spend billions more in dollars than it is taking in which makes it the least effectively run business in America. Yet I hear people all the time that state, “What we need is more government involvement.” Ok, let me get this straight. The government that cannot balance its own budget (even though it has the largest revenue stream) will now be teaching its techniques for success (failure) to the rest of the private economy? That is like going to the homeless shelter and assigning one of the unfortunates to teach their business acumen to the Chamber of Commerce.
We are systematically robbing our children of their birthright in an orgy of spending and irresponsibility. Americans need to demand responsibility in their government and find 545 people with the following skills and character: budgeting, ability to say no, integrity, principle centered, confronting reality, economic principles, historical understanding, vision casting and leadership. I refuse to be part of the generation that sat by idly and allowed our great nation to spend itself into poverty! Every businessman is held responsible to the bottom line by the market and profit and loss. As Americans we must hold our politicians responsible for the bottom line. We can right this ship, but we need less rhetoric and more confronting reality on the issues. Here are just a few suggestions.
1. A government amendment to balance the budget yearly. Leadership requires tough choices and without this amendment tough choices are put off by borrowing money and leaving a bigger problem to the next generation of leaders.
2. Back to a Gold standard or a hybrid system that only produces money when real value is produced in this country. It is too tempting for politicians to artificially produce money and inflate when in a pinch. Real money is only a measurement of value produced, not something that can be printed by fiat.
3. Reduce our foreign soil commitments of troops. If countries desire us to be the police force for them, then they must foot the bill. Who exactly are our troops in Western Germany defending against? Isn’t this an appendage from the Cold War? Cannot Germany defend themselves at this point?
4. Reduce the influence of special interest in the voting process. The elected officials need to represent the voters, not the special interest. Until we can have elected officials that are not owned by special interest, real change will be slow in coming.
Here is an educational video on Keynesian economics that is a must see for all responsible Americans that are concerned about our present financial crisis. Thank you Vince for sending me the link to this video! Please share your thoughts to clean up our government’s mess. God Bless, Orrin Woodward
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoxDyC7y7PM&w=425&h=344]
Posted in Finances, Freedom/Liberty | 1 Comment »
Our American Heritage – Educating the Electorate is the Key
Posted by Orrin Woodward on December 16, 2008
Please pass this on to your email list to help educate the American Electorate.
“A nation of well informed men who have been taught to know and prize the rights which God has given them cannot be enslaved. It is in the region of ignorance that tyranny begins.” – Benjamin Franklin
My subject today is on the lowering standards for spiritual, political, economic, and historical literacy in America. I fear for our country when people can be whipped into a mass frenzy by a speaker’s style more than his substance. Now don’t misread me here. I believe strongly in having a pleasing public speaking style, but that should be secondary to the truth of the speaker’s statements. To follow someone because of their communication skills with no understanding of the underlying message is a breeding ground for disaster. Without an understanding of our American heritage, how are American voters discerning between the spiritual, economic, political and historical issues? Without a basic understanding of our American history all decisions are chosen upon how they make people feel, not on what people think. Sadly, in today’s society, belligerent ignorance is as highly valued as diligent study. You can look at any comments sections of any public blog to see the truth of this statement.
“Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government.” – Thomas Jefferson
Thinking requires a general knowledge of the subject. I cannot have an educated discussion on Albanian politics, because I do not have all of the issues and their historical relevance at my fingertips. If I were asked to be involved in a discussion on the subject, I would have to do some homework to get up to speed. Every four years, people place a vote for the most powerful person in the world. I have wondered, for years, how much homework they have done to apply this nearly sacred honor. I am not one of the people who believes that “image is everything.” In fact, I am one of the people who believes the exact opposite. Give me character over reputation any day of the week. I have learned enough about the media to understand their goal is to paint an image. But as John Wooden says, “Reputation is what people say you are and character is who you are.” Just like a book, I focus on content of the book, not just its cover. If I had to choose, I would take great content with a poor cover than the reverse. In order to understand the content, you must be educated on the principles yourself.
“Liberty cannot be preserved without general knowledge among the people.” – John Adams
Here is a phenomenal test given to Americans to determine their knowledge of American Civil Literacy. Please click on the link and take the test. There are 33 questions in all and it is closed book with no notes. Do not click on the comments as some of the answers are discussed there. Please take the test first. Let’s determine your American Civil Literacy score currently, to help us focus your reading in the proper areas. Tyler Libby, a good friend, a great reader and excellent leader in America, sent me this test with this blurb attached.
Are you more knowledgeable than the average citizen? The average score for all 2,508 Americans taking the following test was 49%; college educators scored 55%. Can you do better? Questions were drawn from past ISI surveys, as well as other nationally recognized exams.
“I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take the power from them, but to inform them by education.” – Thomas Jefferson
I knew that people on the Team have probably done more reading than the average population and even the average college educators/professors. I was concerned that the average scores were coming in around 50%! How can we play our part in our Republic if we only understand half of the principles behind the specific issues? I reflected back on the numerous books in our MonaVie Team system designed to educate our teams and excitedly took the test. I quickly went through the questions and without reviewing them I sent them in for my score. Here is what I received back.
You answered 33 out of 33 correctly — 100.00 %
Average score for this quiz during November: 78.0%
Average score: 78.0%
You can take the quiz as often as you like, however, your score will only count once toward the monthly average.
Since it was early November, I assume there were not many that had taken the test yet for the month. I would ask that everyone on the blog take a few minutes and take the test. Read the questions and answer without using any notes or searching the internet. See what you know currently and that will give you a baseline as you learn and grow in the Team educational system. There is no failure, only a beginning point for further growth! I feel this is one of the most neglected parts of the value of the MonaVie Team training. We do not just train people to be good networkers. We educate people to be good citizens of their countries! Learning and growing should be fun and if it is not then someone took your curiosity from you. A nation that does not know its past cannot possibly chart a proper course for the future! Please share what you learned from taking the test and I will recommend different books based upon your comments to help in your education process.
Here is a website that has some great thoughts on freedom and education. I will post a few paragraphs here. Our Founding Fathers were extremely aware of the importance in a proper moral education for the people in order to have a government of the people, for the people, and by the people.
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never can be.” – Thomas Jefferson
Our founders gave us a nearly perfect form of government, that combined responsibility and accountability. It gave us the responsibility to hold our government accountable for their actions. However, in our prosperity, we have been lulled to sleep.
A system wherein if we shirked our responsibility, then our government would no longer be accountable. Sadly, most of us think the type of government we have is a democracy. The better educated can proudly say that we have a republic. However, among those better educated, not one in a thousand understands the true substantive difference between the two.
There are two main reasons for the dilemma we find ourselves in:
1. We are prosperous—the most prosperous nation on earth, and our prosperity has made us comfortable, and in our comfort, we have abrogated our duties to those who promise to do them for us without any serious scrutiny. And as generation to generation pass, we grow more firm in our lack of understanding, and we do not even know the standards to which our officials should be held.
2. The deliberate dumbing down of our education system in an effort to enslave the public through ignorance and prepare them for world government.
“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” – John Adams
Don’t beat yourself up if you didn’t score well. If you make a decision to improve then you are becoming part of the educated electorate. The question is: are you going to be part of the long-term solution or part of the long-term problem? Spiritual, economic, historical, and political principles must all be learned if we are to be part of the solution! God Bless, Orrin Woodward
Posted in Freedom/Liberty | 1 Comment »
Bob McEwen – Freedom or Statist Control
Posted by Orrin Woodward on November 19, 2008
Bob McEwen spoke to a fired up MonaVie Team in Louisville recently. His message of economics/politics was thoughtful and challenging to each individual. Bob is one of the best at taking complex ideas and describing them in simple metaphors and stories to capture the main principles. It is very important in any discussion to be able to listen and reason with various opinions without immediately getting offended. It is hard to learn when the first response is offense. One of the keys is to determine whether the opinion is backed up by experience. Like the old saying goes, “A person with the facts is never at the mercy of a person with an opinion.” Don’t be threatened by opinions, but study to determine the validity of each opinion from your own experiences. This is why people with results over the long term are the people that I listen to and respect. They have proven that their thoughts are more than just opinions. For example, Abraham Lincoln’s opinion weighs heavier in my mind than many others because of his proven leadership and ability to reason through the issues.
“We all declare for liberty; but in using the same word we do not all mean the same thing. With some the word liberty may mean for each man to do as he pleases with himself, and the product of his labor; while with others, the same word may mean for some men to do as they please with other men, and the product of other men’s labor. Here are two, not only different, but incompatible things, called by the same name – liberty. And it follows that each of the things is, by the respective parties, called by two different and incompatible names – liberty and tyranny.”
The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume VII, “Address at Sanitary Fair, Baltimore, Maryland” (April 18, 1864), p. 301-302.
I love reading about economics, but the only way to truly get the facts in economics is to go and experience them in your own life and businesses. My views have certainly progressed as I witnessed people making economic choices. I believe strongly in the right for all people to be economically free. Without economic freedom, there is no true freedom. Here is a video from part of Bob’s talk from the Louisville weekend. Enjoy. God Bless, Orrin Woodward
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBpAicVVhSQ&w=425&h=344]
Posted in Freedom/Liberty | Comments Off on Bob McEwen – Freedom or Statist Control
Cycle of Democracy – Alexander Fraser Tyler
Posted by Orrin Woodward on November 6, 2008
Orrin Woodward & Chris Brady Launching a Leadership Revolution
The following quote whose origin is believed to be traced back to Alexander Fraser Tyler (Tytler in original Scottish). Regardless of who said it, I believe it is worthy of repeating and expounding in relation to present day America. I have been thinking about this quote and the state of our union for many months. I do not write this article in an attacking spirit, but in a spirit of searching for the right path in a world wandering down blind alleys.
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising them the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over a louse fiscal responsibility, always followed by a dictatorship. The average of the world’s great civilizations before they decline has been 200 years. These nations have progressed in this sequence:”
Here is Tyler’s “Cycle of Democracy” with my thoughts of of America in the cycle.
From bondage to spiritual faith;
The Great Awakening of the 1730’s in the American Colonies was a time of revival and spiritual longing. Jonathon Edwards, considered by many to be America’s greatest mind, led the revival with Biblical sermons and a fire for truth. Edwards taught the unvarnished truth about sinful man and our accountability to an Almighty God. Not surprisingly, he is mocked and laughed at today, but that is more of an indictment of our society than Edwards preaching. Pastor Edward’s magnum opus, Freedom of the Will has never been refuted by any scholar. This was a critical step in developing the conviction to fear God and not man. Even if man happened to be the largest empire in the world in which the sun never set – the British Empire.
From spiritual faith to great courage;
Spiritual faith leads to great courage based upon convictions worth sacrificing for. A person who will does not stand for something, will fall for anything. Think of the true heroes throughout history. One of the uniting principles that all heroes have is a willingness to stand for truth and convictions in a world of untruth and apathy. The Founding Families had great courage to stand for the truth of against tyranny and oppression. They did this because they knew the Bible said, “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty.” The British were moving in the direction of excessive taxation (1 %) and the Colonist would not sit back and allow an offsite government to tax local colonist.
From courage to liberty;
The Colonist defeat of the British Empire was not a defeat of British military forces as much as a victory over British will. The Colonists were fighting for their deeply held principles that they were willing to give their life, wealth and sacred honor for. The British were fighting for some extra taxation in one of their many colonies. The American will defeated the British will because of an imbalance in the convictions involved. With the defeat of Cornwallis and the subsequent genius of our American Constitution, liberty reigned in the United States under rule of law.
From liberty to abundance;
The abundance generated by free enterprise and limited government was one of America’s biggest blessings, but also one of our biggest challenges. One of the few standing economies after WWII was America’s. Our products flowed to nearly all foreign markets creating the wealthiest society in the world’s history. It takes incredible discipline to remember where our blessings come from with abundance heaped upon further abundance. Over time, people forget the principles that created the liberty and the fruit of that liberty. Seeing the inequalities in the blessing of individual citizens, an envy of our fellow Americans germinates. The fruit of this unholy thinking is a desire to take our brothers and sisters abundance and give to those less abounding. Government would have to intervene and right this wrong according to the envious.
From abundance to selfishness;
The 1960’s were a decade of self masquerading as a care for those less fortunate. Free love, destruction of society’s norms, and a drug culture prevailed in the youth. The 1960’s were a rebellion against the plastic society of abundance without the belief in the principles that created that abundance. The Church, having lost conviction of the truths of the Bible, ossified into ghetto culture within America. With little truth in the Church, the youth were left on their own to search for answers to the hypocrisy that engulfed them. Instead of returning to the Biblical principles and the God that created the blessings, society entered into the worship of self and self-actualization. The youth of the 60’s saw the hypocrisy, but in their endless faith in their own holiness marched America even further from its Biblical roots.
From selfishness to complacency;
Without a Biblical foundation, the rebellion was bound to produce worse fruits than the plastic culture it attempted to replace. With no firm convictions to stand upon, the rebellion dissolved into peace and personal affluence. The loss of Biblical absolutes is bound to lead from convictions to surrender to complacency as no one is sure what the truth is. What is the use of standing for anything, if we are not sure that what we are standing for is truth? The 1970’s saw this complacency as the youth joined the “system” and pursued peace and affluence with little understanding of original principles that America was founded upon.
From complacency to apathy;
1980’s were a brief respite in the cycle. Thanks to the leadership and convictions of Ronald Reagan, America stood its ground against Communism and found that Communism was a paper tiger. The respite was short lived because the President, even with his bully pulpit, cannot consistently educate Americans on Biblical truths. This must be a function of the church, which has abdicated their responsibility in an effort to be relative to a lost generation.
The 1990’s saw a near complete surrender to apathy and personal fulfillment. With a near complete rejection of absolute values, people defined their own values and pursued fulfillment in the myriad of choices available to them. People did not care who was running the government as long as they were left alone to pursue the own personal agenda. Government performed by doing focus groups to ascertain what the people wanted and giving it to them, surrendering all leadership responsibilities to the disparate wishes of the people. Government, instead of playing the role of umpire and defender of our freedoms began to play the role of a benevolent dictator. The dictator studied to learn what we wanted and offered that to us with only a presumed token price of submission to the almighty sovereignty of government in the affairs of the citizens.
From apathy to dependency;
The 2000’s will be remembered as the decade of complete submission to the government’s largesse. The American citizen’s depend upon government for their welfare, health care, social security, etc. It would be unthinkable for most Americans to live without the direct involvement of our beneficent Big Brother. The price of dependency is submission of our freedoms to the dictates of Big Brother. The old saying that you boil a frog one degree at a time aptly fits here. If you take a frog and throw him into boiling water, the frog will have enough sense to jump out. But if you turn up the temperature slowly, the frog will open up its pores and will literally be boiled without an attempted escape. Americans are now boiling in our dependency on our government.
From dependency back again to bondage.
Eventually in our dependence, we see our status falling in the free world as slaves can never perform the functions of free men and women. Although the government still mouths the words of our founding fathers, the words have new meanings. The citizens cannot put a finger on the malady, but they know something is not right. In their desperation, they look for a messiah to save them. Because the Churches are not sharing the message of the true messiah and the true way to liberty, the citizens look for a worldly messiah. A perceptive leader, with words that tickle the ears promises to be the searched for messiah. With the republican form of government torn asunder and transformed into a nascent democracy – the powerful words and promises of deliverance speak directly to the masses. A savior is born unto the people and salvation is just around the corner.
A shocking truth is learned too late that man cannot save man and only Jesus Christ can liberate the soul in bondage. A people held in bondage to sin can never be responsible to run a free government. The people in bondage will look to the government the way Christians look to their Savior. Government cannot be the savior to the people and was never intended to be so when created by our Founding Families. America’s national debt is now over $10 trillion and to service the debt on the interest is over $450 billion per year. This makes interest on debt the 3rd biggest item on our governments budget! We are bankrupting our children’s inheritance on the altar of self indulgence! Ben Franklin said after the creation of our Constitution when asked what type of government was created, “A republic, if you can keep it.” A republic was formed to keep the masses from directly running the government and voting the government into bankruptcy. How far have we traveled from our founding principles and roots?
I did not write this to scare people into inactivity, but to awaken our consciences to the choices that face us. We do not have to complete this cycle and just as Ronald Reagan interrupted the cycle, we can too! Will it take convictions and guts? Yes, but a Godly people that have studied the truth of our founding principles will not be swayed by the promises of an almighty government. Examine yourself. Where do you stand at this historic time?
Let me close with one of my brothers favorite authors. The science fiction writer, Robert Heinlein called this issue “Bread and Circuses” – a reference to Roman Emperors providing food and entertainment to distract the masses. In “To Sail beyond the Sunset” the character Lazarus Long discusses this problem:
“A perfect democracy, a ‘warm body’ democracy in which every adult may vote and all votes count equally has no internal feedback for self correction. It depends solely on the wisdom and self-restraint of citizens…which is opposed by the folly and lack of self-restraint of other citizens. What is supposed to happen in a democracy is that each sovereign citizen will always vote in the public interest for the safety and welfare of all. But what does happen is that he votes his own self-interest as he sees it…which for the majority translates as ‘Bread and Circuses’
“Bread and Circuses is the cancer of democracy, the fatal disease for which there is no cure. Democracy often works beautifully at first. But once a state extends the franchise to every warm body, be he producer or parasite, that day marks the beginning of the end of the state. For when the plebs discover that they can vote themselves bread and circuses without limit and that the productive members of the body politic cannot stop them, they will do so, until the state bleeds to death or in its weakened condition the state succumbs to an invader–the barbarians enter Rome.”
Where do you think America is on the cycle and what do you think we must do to address and fix? I will close this article with the Biblical passage from Hosea 4:6-10, which I believe captures the crossroads where America stands. I will address proposed solutions in several future articles. God Bless, Orrin Woodward
6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.
Because you have rejected knowledge,
I also will reject you from being priest for Me;
Because you have forgotten the law of your God,
I also will forget your children.
7 “ The more they increased,
The more they sinned against Me;
I will change[a] their glory[b] into shame.
8 They eat up the sin of My people;
They set their heart on their iniquity.
9 And it shall be: like people, like priest.
So I will punish them for their ways,
And reward them for their deeds.
10 For they shall eat, but not have enough;
They shall commit harlotry, but not increase;
Because they have ceased obeying the LORD.
Posted in Freedom/Liberty | 2 Comments »
Port St. Lucie Bay Fishing
Posted by Orrin Woodward on May 21, 2008
Captain Bill caught and released this big boy snook right underneath our dock. Who wants to get free and go fishing? God Bless, Orrin Woodward
Posted in Freedom/Liberty, Fun | Comments Off on Port St. Lucie Bay Fishing
Wahoo! – Atlantic Ocean Fishing
Posted by Orrin Woodward on May 7, 2008
Life is not always about goals and leadership. When the right day hits, I love having the freedom to go fishing. Having Captain Bill Howard always ready with one of the three boats makes for an exciting day of fishing. The weather was a beautiful 85 degrees and hardly any wind. Only 2 foot waves on the Atlantic. We went trolling with the Team Fountain boat using bubblers and hooked into four fish. Here was the best one a twenty plus pound Wahoo! Wahoo is some of the best tasting fish in the world. Time to get free and come join me for some fishing on the Atlantic. God Bless, Orrin Woodward
Posted in Freedom/Liberty, Fun | Comments Off on Wahoo! – Atlantic Ocean Fishing